The New Bedford City Council recently passed a motion that a nonbinding question be placed on the Nov. 7 general election ballot. “Should the City of New Bedford adopt an Ordinance stabilizing rents, in order to prevent displacement in the local housing rental market?”

We are very disappointed in the outcome of this vote. A simple non-binding yes or no ballot question does not do this very serious issue justice. We would rather see the city take part in a series of public meetings and debates that include residents representing tenants, landlords and owner-occupied homeowners, housing professionals and city housing officials to have conversations about the cost of rental housing in New Bedford and what can be done to mitigate such a serious issue that has been building for years.

Rent stabilization is rent control, and based on past performances in the 1980s and early 1990s, it did not solve rental cost issues, which is why it was voted out by Massachusetts residents. Rent control has reduced the quality and quantity of rental housing wherever it has been tried. An impact study based on extensive research on the effects of rent control across the country shows that rent control leads to a decrease in apartment supply and property tax revenue. Economists overwhelmingly agree that price controls on rent are inefficient and counterproductive, and lead to serious negative impacts for housing markets that hurt low income households and socio-economic challenged families the most.

Rent control is not the solution, but rather a short-term band aid on a larger issue. Currently, there are over 100 units in the construction pipeline in New Bedford, but developers cannot afford to build without the assistance of programs like the  Massachusetts Housing Development Incentive Program (HDIP). The HDIP is woefully underfunded at $10 million for the entire state, but the recent budget proposal by Gov. Healy would bump that to $50 million for the first year and a continued $30 million for future years. We need to foster investment incentives for future construction. We also have to work with all surrounding communities to increase the housing stock in Bristol County, in addition to available public housing. Finally, we need to advocate for the state and federal government to support a more robust housing voucher program and assist city residents with the education and training needed to improve their quality of life.

Paul Chasse is chief executive officer of the Realtor Association of Southeastern Massachusetts.

Thank you to our sponsors

Founding benefactors: Joan and Irwin Jacobs fund of the Jewish Community Foundation, Mary and Jim Ottaway

Learn more about our community of individual donors

For questions about donations, contact Chrystal Walsh, director of advancement, at

For questions about sponsoring The Light, contact Peter Andrews, director of business development and community engagement, at

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *