Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

More than 3,700 people have worked full time or part time on the Vineyard Wind project since development began almost a decade ago, amounting to more than $380 million in direct employee salaries, wages and benefits. 

The project also exceeded its local hiring goals, with more than 70% of union labor coming from southeastern Massachusetts. 

That’s all according to a new report Vineyard Wind quietly released late last month to unions and the state’s energy department.

The Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources, which established the reporting requirement with the wind project, said the annual reporting provides transparency and helps the state assess the industry’s impacts. 

“The Vineyard Wind project has created thousands of good-paying local jobs, training and workforce development to create career pathways for residents of southeastern Massachusetts, and millions of dollars in economic benefits to New Bedford and the state,” said DOER Commissioner Elizabeth Mahony in an email. 

“Vineyard Wind demonstrates that additional offshore wind projects would bring immense benefits to Massachusetts, including lowering energy costs and moving us closer to energy independence,” she continued. 

Vineyard Wind declined The Light’s interview request and request for comment. 

Of those employed, about 40% were members of a union, though last year, most of the jobs (73%) were held by nonunion workers. Most of the jobs were created during the last four years of construction, with 3,300 people working during this period either part time or full time.  

The project was set to finish by March, but was hit with a suspension order by the Trump administration last month halting all construction. The New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal is mostly empty now, save a crew of 35 to 40 workers, one tower and several blade sets. 

David Borges, the report’s author and visiting faculty at UMass Dartmouth, has been tracking the project since 2017 with data provided by the wind company and its subcontractors.

The project fell short, again, of its self-imposed hiring goals for minority and women union workers, which the company attributed in part to “broader, long-standing demographic challenges” in the male-dominated field of construction, he wrote.  

Through September 2025, about 70% of union workers lived in Southeastern Massachusetts, which exceeded Vineyard Wind’s target of 51%. The region is fairly broad in this report, defined as Barnstable, Bristol, Dukes, Nantucket or Plymouth counties; 54% resided in Bristol County.  

The 70% figure includes those who temporarily relocated for the job (estimated to be 113 people, or 7% of the region’s total).

Local hiring in New Bedford peaked in 2024 and 2025, when 22% of the project workforce each year was city residents, according to figures provided by Borges that were not in the report. A small number of people in these counts may have temporarily relocated to the city. 

As for nonlocals, many came from port regions in Louisiana and Texas, Borges said, where the oil industry has long employed people with related skills. Others came from overseas, though people who never had “boots on the ground” (i.e. stayed offshore and on vessels) were not counted.

Foreigners weren’t just white collar office staff, Borges noted. They were also skilled in construction, bringing years of experience working for the mature wind industry overseas. 

“We’re sort of in this space where there’s not enough pipeline of local workforce,” he said. “That was the hope in the long run, but people don’t want to get training for a job that might not exist.” (He’s, of course, talking about the hits the industry has incurred since President Donald Trump assumed office again last year.)

Aaron Waechter, a union millwright from New Hampshire, is a crew lead for tower installation offshore. He’s worked alongside Danish, French, Belgian, British, Romanian, Polish, Dutch and Spanish experts on a specialized installation vessel since 2023. Among Americans, it’s been a mix of union and nonunion workers from New England and beyond, he said. 

Aaron Waechter, a union millwright from New Hampshire, after installing a blade at the Vineyard Wind site in November 2023. One blade can take a few hours to install. Credit: Aaron Waechter.

“The word ‘steady’ isn’t always in our vocabulary. Offshore wind has provided extremely steady work,” said Andy Benedetto, business representative for New England’s millwrights union. 

Some millwrights, he said, found at least two years of consistent work at the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal. It’s been a change from the seasonal, sporadic work to which they’re accustomed.

Waechter, a husband and father with young children, said the job has provided consistency. He works three weeks offshore, and then is off for three weeks. 

“I know a lot of people who having this type of work available has made an impact on what they’re able to do for their families,” he said. “Before this, I would travel across the country to where there was work.” Sometimes, it meant being away for two months.

“This job gave me a fixed schedule,” he said. “It’s been really good for the kids and for my wife.”

The wind project directly paid or spurred more than $620 million in labor spending, Borges calculated, defined as the sum of all payments made to employees, including wages, salaries, benefits, and payroll taxes. This figure includes people not employed by Vineyard Wind, but by businesses and companies contracting with the project. 

Borges included a headcount figure in his report, in addition to the more nebulous industry standard of full-time equivalents (or FTEs). One FTE represents work fulfilled by a 9-to-5, five days a week, 52 weeks a year position. (Two or three part-time workers can amount to one FTE.) 

“I have each employee who has ever worked on the project in a database,” Borges said. “I can see month to month how many hours they worked. They leave, they come back. Some work for a week.”

John Dunderdale, business manager for Piledrivers Local Union 56, said the latest jobs report tells the success story of union labor rising to the occasion and meeting the needs of the new offshore wind market. 

He estimates about 250 members — piledrivers, carpenters and millwrights — worked on the project at various points, including as many as 50 piledrivers during installation of the turbine foundations. 

But with construction nearly done, he said he has maybe one piledriver left on the job. Dozens of union workers have since moved on to help with other projects, such as Revolution Wind and New York’s Empire Wind. 

A union sign hangs outside the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal. Credit: Eleonora Bianchi / The New Bedford Light

Economic impacts

Borges also measured indirect impacts, broadly defined as supply chain spending. It would include a company hired for Vineyard Wind, as an example, contracting with a local ship repair business in New Bedford.

“That creates increased demand for services. That supplier in turn has to hire new people or buy new supplies to fill in,” Borges said. Other examples include subcontractors patronizing a city print shop, fuel station, or food supplier. 

Induced impacts, another category Borges measured, are estimated using a model that factors in federal data, like census counts and labor statistics. He feeds the model with data provided by Vineyard Wind, businesses and employers, and the model adds a multiplier that estimates how much of a ripple effect a dollar spent has in a community. 

In all, he estimated that Vineyard Wind to date has created $1.9 billion in economic output in Massachusetts, from the project’s direct spending down to an employee’s household spending in a community.  

It is just an estimate, and Borges said one challenge is that this industry is new to the U.S., so there’s no historical data specific to offshore wind to work with.

Consistent with the project wrapping up, fewer people and hours were being worked by the fall of 2025 — the fourth year of construction. Most of the work went to nonunion members, with about half of them coming from out of state.  

Once the project enters the long-term operations and maintenance phase, which is set to last at least 20 years, Vineyard Wind expects to create 80 to 100 permanent jobs. However, for at least the first few years, some of the jobs may be held by employees of the turbine manufacturer, GE Vernova. 

Borges’ contract with Vineyard Wind is set to end in March, but he hopes to issue a final report summarizing everything he’s tracked for almost a decade. 

Email Anastasia E. Lennon at alennon@newbedfordlight.org.


9 replies on “Vineyard Wind report: Project has created more than 3,700 jobs”

  1. The offshore wind and the solar programs have done nothing but enrich a few at the expense of the overall New England economy. New England and California have by far the highest electricity costs in the nation now and that is forcing what businesses are left out of the region. Tax collections go down as a result and our pols just raise taxes for the rest. The program is a fraud and regressive promulgated by the Cambridge elite. These jobs are fleeting. The future is grim.

    1. What is the total Vineyard Wind payroll for Bristol county residents?
      How has Vineyard Wind negatively impacted the New England economy?

  2. Just another New Bedford Light fantasy story. New Bedford residents look at their tax and electric bills and can clearly see that wind has not provided the economic impact to bring the much needed city revenue that would help stop rising taxes and help stop rising electric rates.

  3. Did the reporter ask for back up on this statement? “Vineyard Wind demonstrates that additional offshore wind projects would bring immense benefits to Massachusetts, including lowering energy costs and moving us closer to energy independence,” she continued.”

    Per basic physics that require back up energy at all times and math showing the $89/Mwh is triple the usual MA rates, that statement by Ms. Mahoney at DOER is patently false.

  4. I thought that this was just a Press Release from New Bedford Light, which I assumed was the public utility. It paints a glowing picture of Wind Power, which doesn’t work when it’s calm and then when it’s windy, they feather the blades do that they don’t self destruct. It’s too temperamental for a region that needs constant consistent power output to sustain business and heat/power our homes. When the wind chill factor plunges or in the summer doldrums when you gasp for cool air, wind power is no where to be found….who needs friends or power sources like that ?

  5. “Lies, damned lies, and statistics” is a phrase highlighting how data can be manipulated to mislead, support weak arguments, or twist the truth. 
    If these companies are so transparent as quoted in your article, “The Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources, which established the reporting requirement with the wind project, said the annual reporting provides transparency and helps the state assess the industry’s impacts”.
    Why as also quoted “Vineyard Wind declined The Light’s interview request and request for comment.”
    These companies are so transparent that questions are not allowed?
    What are they really hiding in both economic and environmental data?
    Enquiring minds would like to know.

  6. This story claims 3,700 jobs created.
    1. Where did those numbers originate?
    2. Of the 3,700 jobs created how many are in USA and how many are non USA?
    3. 70% is local union labor, what is the number of employees that equal that 70%
    4. When will New Bedford residents pay less than the national average on their total electric bill?

  7. Who are those people working in the Vineyard Wind New Bedford assembly yards?
    Maintaining the wind turbines?
    Crewing wind Crew Transfer Vessels?
    Looking back I can’t see where New Bedford has ever paid less than the national average.

Comments are closed.