Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

The mayor of New Bedford was far from home.

He was standing just yards away from the fence at the Gaza border in Israel. One week earlier, he had held meetings in New Bedford on code enforcement and public schools. Now, he was within “rocket range” of Hamas.

Mayor Jon Mitchell was leading an exchange trip with two other U.S. mayors in April. They made stops in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, and they surveyed war-torn Israeli towns along the Gaza border. A few days later, Mitchell was back in New Bedford to work on the city budget.

The Israel expedition was one of 11 business trips Mitchell took in a one-year period. He traveled farther, more frequently, and at a higher expense that year than any other Massachusetts mayor outside Boston, a New Bedford Light analysis found.

The Light analyzed calendar and expense records for the 53 people in Massachusetts who held the title of “mayor” outside the state’s capital from July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024. The analysis only included travel outside New England on official business, excluding day trips to nearby states and personal vacations.

Mitchell spent 27 full business days on business trips, equivalent to more than five working weeks spent out of town. 


Business days Mitchell spent on trips

Numbers and destinations are shown for official travel between July 2023 and June 2024.


He flew to Washington, D.C. four times and southern California twice. He visited Miami in March. Last summer, he was in the Azores; this summer, he visited Kansas City and Baltimore. Most of his trips were for conferences with other city leaders, including multiple meetings with the U.S. Conference of Mayors.

Mitchell’s 11 trips far outnumber those of his peers. Mayors from Beverly, Salem, and Cambridge each went on three business trips that year. A few other mayors took one or two trips, while the majority took none at all.

The mayors who traveled on the public’s dime also mostly went to conferences with other local leaders, including meetings organized by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the Aspen Institute, and Bloomberg Philanthropies.

When she heard that New Bedford’s mayor had outspent his peers, City Council Finance Committee Chair Linda Morad had questions.

“You’re spending taxpayer money for what purpose?” she asked. “Justify the expense to me.”

In an interview with The Light, Mitchell said the trips allow him to learn new ideas, advocate for New Bedford’s interests, bring federal resources back to the city, and promote the city’s industries.

“You cannot do this job the right way if you’re not out there promoting the city,” he said.

The mayor’s trips cost the city over $14,000, according to receipts obtained through a public records request and additional information provided by a city public information officer.

Other mayors spent less. Beverly Mayor Michael Cahill spent the second-most on business trips, with $7,225 in expenses, records show. He went to some of the same mayoral conferences as Mitchell in Washington, Miami, and Kansas City. Six other mayors spent sums ranging from $355 to $5,799.


Mayoral travel dates between July 2023 and June 2024

These calendars show days (highlighted in red) when the mayor had any travel activity on his schedule, including early-morning or late-afternoon flights.


New Bedford’s investment in the trips is worth it, Mitchell said.

“The resources that have been secured by dint of my going to conferences, and doing the networking, and getting to know people, pay for the travel I’ve done over the years many, many times over,” he said.

Mitchell said he traveled much more often during the year The Light analyzed than he has in any other year of his tenure as mayor. He added that he turns down more invitations to travel than he accepts.

“When I travel, it’s an inconvenience to me,” he said. “I do it if I determine it’s in the city’s interest.”

Even while he’s attending conferences, the mayor is constantly in touch with his staff back in New Bedford, he said. 

Mitchell said that comparing him to other mayors is like “apples and oranges.” Each community has different needs and interests, he said, and the role of a mayor varies depending on each city’s government structure.

Justifying the costs

The $14,414 that the city spent on trips helped cover hotels, flights, and taxis for the mayor. Some expenses not included in that total were paid for or reimbursed by the outside entities that organized the trips.

Travel expenses for the four U.S. Conference of Mayors meetings totaled $10,699, with costs for each trip ranging from $2,071 to $3,812.

The city spent $960 to put Mitchell up in the Santa Barbara Ritz-Carlton for a February mayors conference. Mitchell said that’s where all the attendees were staying, and he did not get to pick the hotel.

Morad, the finance committee chair, wanted to know why Mitchell was spending more time and money on trips than other mayors around the state. The council’s audit committee recently held a hearing on the mayor’s office spending more than the council had budgeted for it.

“[Mitchell] keeps coming to the council telling us he needs more money,” Morad said. “And yet here he is at the top of the pack being out of the city more than 10% of the year.”

The cost of the trips is small compared to the city’s $515 million budget, Mitchell said.

“It’s less than a rounding error,” he said. “It is a blip.”

He also pointed to the value the city gets from the trips. The city has received free management training and support from a Harvard-educated data analyst through a Bloomberg Philanthropies program that would normally have cost over $300,000, he said. 

And he said he’s able to run the city more efficiently because of what he learns on trips, though it’s hard to put an exact number on the city’s savings. He also pointed to grant money obtained through meetings with federal officials in D.C.

Worldwide travel

Mitchell not only traveled more frequently than his peers — he also traveled much farther. He was the only Massachusetts mayor in The Light’s analysis to travel internationally, with his trips to Israel and Portugal.

The small delegation of mayors that traveled to Israel for a few days in April met with academics, officials, and the families of hostages held by Hamas. Mitchell was joined by Mayor Daniel Rickman of Columbia, South Carolina; Mayor Travis Stovall of Gresham, Oregon; and other officials from the U.S. Conference of Mayors and American Jewish Committee.

The meeting with officials in Tel Aviv was “within rocket range” of the terrorist group, Mitchell recalled in an interview.

New Bedford Mayor Jon Mitchell, third from right, accompanies a group of mayors and officials from the U.S. Conference of Mayors and Project Interchange during a visit to Israel in April. Credit: Photo provided by Jon Mitchell

A city public information officer later clarified in an email that “meetings the Mayor joined near the Gaza border were within range of munitions Hamas was using at the time. Hamas fired longer range rockets on Tel Aviv earlier in the conflict, but Tel Aviv was not fired upon while the Mayor was there.”

He put the local geography into context by comparing it to familiar distances in Massachusetts. Parts of the West Bank are closer to Tel Aviv than Fall River is to New Bedford, he said. The distance between the Tel Aviv city limits and the Gaza Strip is similar to the distance from New Bedford to Brockton.

“You can’t help but feel this sense of insecurity, like the bad guys are all over the place,” he said.

But what does violence in the Middle East have to do with running a mid-sized city in Massachusetts?

“It’s something that people were talking about,” Mitchell said. Local people have protested against the war, he said, and the local Jewish community is “on edge.”

The Israel trip was paid for by its organizers, the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the American Jewish Committee. Reimbursement for Mitchell’s $246 parking fee at Logan Airport is “under review” by the committee, the city public information officer said.

Mitchell visited the Azores for five days over Labor Day weekend last year to celebrate the 50th anniversary of New Bedford’s sister city agreement with Horta, a small Portuguese city that was once a whaling port.

Mitchell’s trip also commemorated the 65th anniversary of the Azorean Refugee Act, which lifted immigration quotas for Azoreans after a devastating volcano eruption on the Island of Faial.

The city paid $2,162 to cover Mitchell’s airfare, parking, and checked luggage.

The mayor said it was his first official trip to Portugal as mayor. He said he has turned down at least 10 other invitations from Portuguese officials to visit their country because he hasn’t had the time.

“It was very well worth the learning opportunity to appreciate where many people who live in Greater New Bedford came from,” he said. “I probably should have done that years ago.”

He added that he’s overdue for a visit to Cape Verde.

Learning from others

Conferences with other city leaders, which accounted for nine of the mayor’s 11 trips, are a chance to learn about how other communities are approaching certain issues, Mitchell said.

“When you have conversations with other professionals who are doing work similar to your own, light bulbs go off,” he said.

The mayor said he brings back the best ideas to implement in New Bedford. He attends sessions on issues like public safety, housing, and broadband internet.

Mitchell said one conversation he had with a federal official helped him identify the best consultant to do a feasibility study for a city-owned broadband network.

He also said he sat next to the CEO of a major airline at a dinner two years ago, which gave him the opportunity to ask about how to attract commercial air service to the New Bedford airport.

Mitchell went on five trips for the U.S. Conference of Mayors. He’s currently a member of the organization’s Board of Trustees. He is the only member of the board from New England, and he said he’s the first Massachusetts mayor outside Boston to be elected to the position.

The position allows Mitchell to influence the organization’s “urban agenda” and “elevate New Bedford’s national profile,” a city public information officer wrote in a statement.

“I don’t want to brag about it, but I actually think it’s a big deal,” Mitchell said.

Board members must attend at least three of the organization’s four meetings every year, according to a city public information officer. Mitchell attended all four in the year analyzed by The Light.

Two trips were part of programs for Bloomberg Philanthropies, the organization of billionaire and former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg.

“The Bloomberg stuff has paid off for us multi-fold,” Mitchell said.

Bloomberg provided free “executive training” for the mayor and other top city officials, taught by Harvard professors.

And New Bedford’s participation in the Bloomberg Data Alliance has helped the city “beef up” its use of data to improve services, Mitchell said. The city’s new, data-driven fire prevention strategy contributed to a 25% drop in structure fires, he said.

“We’ve probably saved some lives,” he said.

Working with Washington

Mitchell said he meets often with federal officials who have power over issues that matter to New Bedford. Commercial fishing policy is a top priority, he said.

The mayor said that while he was in D.C. a few weeks ago for another conference, he took “side trips” to meet with two members of Congress, representatives of the scallop industry, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, and Social Security Administration Commissioner Martin O’Malley.

The meeting with O’Malley was to discuss the planned closure of a federal office building in New Bedford, Mitchell said.

“You don’t see all that on my calendar,” he said. “The calendar, I will note, does not represent the full — not even close, to the full set of activities I do at any given time.”

Meetings like these are key to securing federal grants, Mitchell said. The $24 million grant that the Port of New Bedford received to expand Leonard’s Wharf wouldn’t have been possible if Mitchell didn’t personally know Buttigieg and his staff, the mayor said.

“When I travel, I’m the reflection of the city, and they have confidence in me,” he said.

Spreading the word

The trips allow Mitchell to promote the city to the rest of the world, he said, particularly as a port for offshore wind projects.

“It is absolutely imperative for New Bedford to be put on the map,” he said.

The mayor used his past position as the chair of the energy committee of the U.S. Conference of Mayors as a platform for that advocacy, he said. In March, he spoke at a climate conference in Miami. Other New Bedford officials travel abroad to offshore wind trade conferences to make sure people in the industry know New Bedford, he said.

Mitchell’s current position as a trustee of the U.S. Conference of Mayors gives him a significant platform to promote the city, he said.

The spirit of transparency 

The city pushed back against releasing records of Mitchell’s travel expenses for months. The Light first filed its public records request at the beginning of July, but the city asked for a $4,020 processing fee. Months of negotiations between the city and The Light followed.

Twice, the state Supervisor of Records determined that the city had not demonstrated that its fee was allowed under Massachusetts records laws. The city asked for a reconsideration, but the supervisor declined.

In October, more than 16 weeks after The Light first submitted its request, the city released the records free of charge, waiving all fees “in the spirit of transparency.”

In a message sent after the interview with Mitchell, city public information officer Jon Darling wrote that The Light was trying to “make a case that Mayor Mitchell is gallivanting around the country on the city’s dime” by requesting travel records from other mayors.

“The news here isn’t the number of trips he took nor the minute cost to the city relative to its budget, but the window into the work of a mayor who is completely devoted to his city and highly effective at his job,” Darling wrote.

Email Grace Ferguson at gferguson@newbedfordlight.org



Keep The Light shining with your donation.

As an independent, nonprofit news outlet, we rely on reader support to help fund the kind of in-depth journalism that keeps the public informed and holds the powerful accountable. Thank you for your support.

$
$
$

Your contribution is appreciated.

13 replies on “Mayor on the move”

  1. Interesting article. The mayor serves in a leadership position with The Conference of Mayors, so he should be leading, which this article demonstrates. He certainly was not padding his expenses. The amount of travel averages $250/day. If he was in communication with his staff while away, and learning about practices that help the city, I don’t know what the big deal is. Councilor Morad has a right to question the expenses, but to me this article points out that Mayor Mitchell is being innovative by gathering best practices and promoting New Bedford.

  2. This article shakes my faith in the Light. I can’t believe you chose this story for more content than most stories. A total of $14,000 over multiple trips is very small and doesn’t deserve this attention. You should be putting this amount of energy on issues of much more significance. It smacks of a negative bias towards the Mayor and amateur journalism. I am disappointed in the Light and this article will make me wary as I read future stories.

  3. It’s amazing that you will post entire hit pieces about the mayor, obviously at Linda Morad’s insistence, but you won’t even allow comments critical of Councilor Morad to be posted. So much for the ‘spirit of transparency’.

    I’m so disappointed in what The Light has become; just a shallow (and yellow) mouthpiece for the City Council.

  4. Time for a leadership change in City Hall, over 10 years of John Mitchell and every year our taxes have gone up, while he continues to grow the bloated city budget with new positions, new departments, along with non profits, state agencies and programs that do not contribute to our tax base. The Taxpayers of New Bedford deserve better.

  5. Considering how wasteful the city is with executing infrastructure projects and improvements downtown, $14k is nothing. The guy went to Portugal for $2,100. If anything he should be applauded for keeping the costs down. Can you even fly to Portugal for that amount?

  6. Spending our money that’s why we pay high taxes in this city there’s no reason for him to take all these trips to Israel he’s not and ambassador it’s f******

  7. I couldn’t agree more with the first three people who posted comments on this article about Mayor Jon Mitchell’s travel expenses, and the underrated positive impacts his contacts with other Mayors of different cities throughout America, with federal officials in Washington DC, and other locations where they may have interacted during similar conferences, conventions, or regional events, and international business related trips. I’m not surprised that the city council appears to be leading New Bedford tax payers to believe that less than $15,000 dollars in travel expenses over multiple years, and several terms in office were a waste of our money as there isn’t a single comment from anyone other than the Mayor that suggests, or agrees that any of the trips and events he attended and the resulting contacts made may have had any positive impact for the city and the tax payers.
    I’d really like to know how much time and effort was spent by Councilor Morad to verify every nickel spent on the travel expenses of Mayor Mitchell, and how much money New Bedford has either saved, or gained in private investments in the city as a direct result of the events attended, and business relationships made resulting in any current, and, or, future positive financial impact in New Bedford, and the tax payers, has there been any research or direct questions asked of the Mayor beyond the information he offered? With the exception of Ward 1 Councilor Choquette, I highly doubt that any member of the city council has even considered that possibility due to the fact that they’re clearly critical of Mayor Mitchell regardless of the issue. A great comparison is Congressional Democrats who are already fiercely critical of President Trump, even after an overwhelming election victory following the miserable failure of the Biden administration, and the negative impact on every aspect of life in America, Democrats are already preparing to do everything possible to derail The Trump Administration, and undoubted ability to keep his promise to the American people to successfully correct everything he possibly can to Make America Great Again.

  8. Obviously, The New Bedford Light is a liberal Democrat news site that I’ll no longer read or support since your censorship is as evident as your objections of the first amendment, you should be ashamed and and forced out of business. I’ll be sharing this comment with friends, family, coworkers, and social media including X, Truth Social, Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp and more.

  9. There is no defending Mayor Mitchell, for over 10 years in office, and every year our taxes have gone up. Look it up, do the research, it is just the facts. New Bedford residents deserve better.

  10. If possible, the mayor could reduce doubt by listing places he has gone to and what was the result for New Bedford. He went to some city and what did he come back with for NB. Even if it was just an idea, a possible thing, he should mention it. Might help

  11. This article is tame and yet the mayor, the city public information officer, and some commenters act like this is a “hit piece”? Seriously?

    People are angry with the current state of things and they are sick of the political BS that holds the majority of the population down. People want transparency, as evidenced by the overwhelming voter response to Question 1. Yet, the mayor actively avoided sharing information with the press.

    To simply defend the Mayor’s travel misses the point. The Mayor obstructed access to information immediately relevant to voters. The City went so far as to request over $4000 in exchange for that information. He even appealed the Supervisor of Records’ decision. That is more suspicious than the number of trips and how much they cost. If the trips were so defensible, why try so hard to impede the New Bedford Light?

    Add to that, other officers who are also supposed to serve the public are doing their best to elevate the Mayor to an infallible status. That cannot be true of anyone, much less someone responsible for an entire city of people. We have to hold the powerful accountable. Otherwise, they will lose their way even if their original intent was true.

    Every meeting he attended likely exposed him to lobbyists. If we are left out of the loop, who will advocate for the people? How can we possibly speak up against a problem if its existence is obscured?

    I am most disturbed by the demonizing of the press by Jon Darling. He is an information officer, NOT the Mayor’s public relations manager. When information is withheld from the press, that is a red flag. The Democratic Party tells us that’s how we know which politicians and billionaires are bad. So, why doesn’t that measuring stick get used when discussing their party?

    I am sick of the wordplay and hypocrisy, be it from journalists, corporations, or politicians. We need independent media. That’s how the public has any hope of having a real voice. We need to put politicians like Mayor Mitchell in the past. The people need real leaders, not the ones set on exploiting the people’s resources.

    To me, the article shows what I already know about Mayor Mitchell. He is out for himself. When he talks about “promoting New Bedford,” he speaks of the city, as an entity, and the land. He speaks of the opportunities for businesses to exploit. Mayor Mitchell is not FOR the people he is supposed to represent and protect.

    Listen to what he’s saying. He’s showing you who he is and what his vision is for the city. If you believe in him, fine, but keep an eye on him. Take the broadband issue, for example. Will we see a change in New Bedford? I pay approximately $150 for internet only with Xfinity and it will go up by June, to $175. Xfinity refuses to work with me on this and there’s no real competition in my area. Why have Verizon’s options never improved? How long ago was FIOS promised? Why is T-Mobile not here?

    The Mayor is working on attracting businesses that are not good for our city. Look into Parallel Products, rebranding as South Coast Renewables. Mitchell chooses the TRASH business over people. Listen to Leo Choquette’s moving speech about Crapo Hill’s “legacy of trash”. I think you can still find it on New Bedford Live. It may even be on Choquette’s Facebook page.

    Pay attention and hold officials accountable. Mitchell isn’t a ‘good guy’ because he goes to tree lighting or puts himself ‘within missile range’. He’s just another politician playing a game when the rest of us are struggling to make ends meet.

Comments are closed.